I was reading a comparison
between Adobe's Tamarin JIT and Sun's HotSpot and there
was some discussion started by Chris:
Maybe, I'm missing something, but I really don't see why Mozilla doesn't build on the Java platform rather than Tamarin. Investing effort in writing a full ECMAScript 3 or 4 translator to JVM byte-code seems like an easier and faster way to get much better results than Tamarin.
To which one of Brendan Eich's replies was:
We don't depend on closed source in-process code, period. I've also mentioned the license requirements, not that it mattered due to the lateness of Java's open source transition (GPL alone is not ok).
I ran the same program that was posted there on Mono, and extrapolating the values (my machine is faster than Chris, but am using Java HotSpot 1.6):
Someone on the thread pointed out that using type
annotations might bring Tamarin to 11 seconds. Update:
, but Chris was
not able to replicate that behavior..
It is clear that Mono's floating point performance is far from ideal. Currently Mono on x86-32 platforms is still using the x87 "stack" style of floating point operations as opposed to the more efficient XMM style of code generation that we used on x86-64. We should look into this.
Update: Mike ran the tests on x86-64 where Mono has a different floating point implementation and the results are promising, instead of being 4 times slower than Java in this test Mono is only 2 times slower.
That being said, for Mozilla purposes, it seems that using Mono as their JIT instead of Tamarin would be a better choice:
Planning-wise its probably too late to use Mono on Mozilla, which is a shame.
This could probably be prototyped on WebKit/Gtk easily.
Posted on 06 Aug 2007