After a few years in the oven, we are ready to announce the first release of MonoDevelop. Lluis has put together a set of in-depth release notes that covers the major features available in MonoDevelop and links to various tutorials and screencasts as well as extensive screenshots of what is available in MonoDevelop 1.0.
MonoDevelop 1.0 is designed mostly for Linux developers creating Gnome and ASP.NET applications but MonoDevelop is also available for MacOS users that download our Mono installer and will still be useful if they are building Mono-based applications on OSX.
The IDE has many of the features that you would expect from a modern IDE for Mono: support for programming in multiple languages, an extensible design, editors and designers for ASP.NET and Gnome applications, integration with Unix toolchains and Visual Studio Solutions, support for source code control and following standard Unix development practices, integrated NUnit testing, Unix Packaging and Deployment (following the GNU conventions, and Mono conventions for libraries and packages), internationalization and localization, tools to maintain your project documentation and command line tools to access this functionality.
We have some pretty good language support in this release: C#, VisualBasic.NET, Java, C and C++. Check the previous link for the details as to how extensive the support is for each feature.
There is more documentation on MonoDevelop available as well.
In late 2003, a few developers were looking for an IDE to write C# code in Linux, not something too fancy, but something that would provide Intellisense features.
Windows developers were used to Visual Studio, and Mike Krueger and the developers at Alpha Sierra Papa had created the very successful SharpDevelop project, a .NET Windows.Forms-based application. At the time, Mono did not have a working Windows.Forms implementation (it would take another three years before our official 1.0 release of Windows.Forms) so this ruled.
Although there had been an attempt to make SharpDevelop portable by Mike (with a variation on the theme of Eclipse's toolkit) this effort had not been completed, and SharpDevelop continued to be a Windows.Forms application.
Pedro Abelleira first extracted the editor and intellisense engine from SharpDevelop into a standalone component that rendered using Gtk# instead of Windows.Forms. This was back late in 2003. Initially it was only going to be a text editor.
Development started mostly on irc and quickly contributors started to porting various other pieces from SharpDevelop or rewriting the GUI components with Glade and Gtk#. By late 2003 Todd Berman had taken over the maintenance duties of MonoDevelop and sent me a email on December 31st:
Oh, and we are shooting for eating our own MonoDevelop dog food by the end of this coming weekend, and it looks like we will be there even before then.
As regular Gnome developers were were very happy using Glade and Gtk#'s [Widget] attributes to bind the XML GUI representation to our own variables. You double clicked on the .glade file, and Glade would launch from within MonoDevelop, you would tweak your UI, save it, and rerun from MonoDevelop.
Around this time Dan Winship from the desktop team started working on a new GUI designer for Gnome, the Stetic GUI designer. This was a Gtk#-based GUI designer, and the idea is that this could be embedded in other applications. An early screencast of Stetic capabilities is available here:
Stetic in March 2005.
Work continued, but Dan eventually moved on to other projects. By the end of 2005 we were looking at integrating a GUI designer directly into MonoDevelop and Stetic was not ready to do that, so instead Lluis integrated Glade-3 into MonoDevelop:
MonoDevelop with Glade-3, January 2006
This project did not live for too long. Glade-3 had to be patched, and we quickly realized that all the features that we wanted would require more than trivial changes to Glade-3. So we decided that instead of investing time in the C code base and the bridge to C#, that we would complete Stetic which was entirely written in C#, this is what it looks like today:
Stetic Designer inside MonoDevelop.
A complete screencast of Stetic and today's MonoDevelop integration shows all the work that Lluis and his team did to provide a smooth editing experience.
Today MonoDevelop not only supports forms design, but it also provides menu and toolbar editors and support for managing your icon collection in your application.
A key feature of .NET is the creation of reusable components. Lluis brought this to MonoDevelop and the stetic editor. This screencast shows how to create widget libraries with MonoDevelop and Stetic that you can later reuse in your projects or in other projects.
The team has already started work on the next release of MonoDevelop, version 1.1. Our goal is to release new versions of MonoDevelop every six months. To do this, we are planning on doing all of the disruptive changes on branches, and always keep our HEAD revision stable.
There are a number of incremental improvements on our task list, but also some exciting new features. There were many things that we could not get in time for 1.0 are being incorporated or implemented since the 1.0 tree branched a few months ago. Some of the new features that trunk users or alpha testers can get include:
New Managed Editor: The text editor is now entirely managed and has many new features like configurable keybindings (Really nice Emacs keybindings), split windows, Emacs/Firefox-like incremental search on a toolbar (no more annoying dialog box popping up in the middle of your source code) and one of the most requested features: region folding.
Moving to a fully managed widget written in C# gives us a lot of flexibility to improve the editor. This is a theme that was consistent in the 1.0 release, moving from Glade to Stetic and moving from the GdlDock to our own managed dock paid off every time in terms of developer agility and features that we could implement.
ASP.NET editor: new improvements will provide auto-complete and intellisense while editing .aspx files. Also, with the maturity of WebKit/Gtk we are hoping to replace Mozilla as the GUI editor for ASP.NET pages with this.
Integrated Debugging: Currently the Mono Debugger is only available as a command line tool. Our next release of MonoDevelop will provide debugging directly from the IDE.
Windows Port: There is now a Windows profile release of MonoDevelop. This will be great for developers that are building applications using Gtk# on Windows and want to get access to the Stetic GUI designer which currently requires them to use Linux to do this. It is not our intention to compete with SharpDevelop as an open source IDE for Windows Programmers although there might be some overlap.
msbuild-based model: We want to move to the Visual Studio build model to improve interoperability with Visual Studio, Blend and SharpDevelop and other tools that use msbuild files as their interoperability layer. This will allow developers to easily move across tools to work on different parts of a project.
XML Editor: A backport from SharpDevelop's XML editor has been integrated.
Future versions of MonoDevelop will extend on this feature set an integrate Ivan's Windows.Forms designer, Alan's Silverlight designer and improve Michael's ASP.NET designer.
Posted on 14 Mar 2008
This video shows the Mono C# compiler building a sample native ObjC# application on the iPhone and then running the resulting executable on the iPhone.
Pay special attention to the beautiful error messages that our C# compiler generates.
This is using the ObjC# bindings that provide access to the Objective-C APIs from C#.
Update: better version, this one the typing with two hands and with some widgets on the screen and some events hooked up:
Of course, the iPhone is a locked platform, and chances of people being allowed to run Mono seem low.
Posted on 12 Mar 2008
Just got back from Mix 08 in Las Vegas. It was good to catch up again with old friends and make new friends. As usual, the event was a blast. To me the big interesting news were Silverlight 2.0 and the ASP.NET MVC release (details at Phil's blog).
Ray's keynote was light on the details, and too abstract for my taste.
The IE8 announcements were interesting. Their contributed test suite for CSS is good news, and came up with two nice new features: activities and webslices. Both ideas and their specifications were released under the OSP, and apparently by the end of the day there was a Mozilla plugin that implemented Activities. Hopefully we will get WebSlices on Linux as well.
Of course my personal favorite were the Silverlight 2 updates.
Since I attended mostly the hallway session, am using this weekend to catch up on the actual sessions. But I loved Joe Stegman's presentation on Silverlight 2 which Mike Harsh described as "we wanted to show code, not slides, lots of examples; you know, developer porn".
Sadly, I could not make it back to Part 2 with Mike, as the room was full and the bouncers were turning people away (and I also missed the repeat the next day).
If you love the software that you build, Jensen Harris' presentation on the History of the Office Ribbon is probably the most inspiring talk I have seen in years.
Every developer building GUI applications should listen to this presentation. This is as inspiring as Joel's articles on UI design were a few years ago when we were working on GNOME 2 or Andy's focus on empowering users were back on the Eazel days.
First things first. Catching up with Silverlight 2 is a great place to get demos, samples, tutorials, presentations and in-depth coverage of what is new in Silverlight 2.
Silverlight 1.1 consisted of a .NET binding on top of the core Silverlight 1.0 engine and the addition of the DLR and DLR-based languages. This was never intended to be the last word on it, and it was mostly a showcase of things to come.
Silverlight 2 is the evolution of the 1.1 model in a number of directions.
The distribution model: Possibly the most interesting change is that there is now a "core" of Silverlight that will be available on every system and a model to bundle extra libraries for Silverlight. This keeps the Silverlight 2 download small, but most importantly it means that Silverlight 2.0 can ship without having to complete and freeze the APIs for every possible feature that people want.
The "extras" collection of controls are delivered in this way (like the databound controls) as well as things like the DLR. This means that you can use the DLR today, and still allow the DLR and Iron* teams to continue working and improving it without locking developers to an old version of the DLR that would have been deployed with every 2.0 installation.
Some other important changes:
There was apparently a miss-understanding and the controls were released inadvertently under a more restrictive license, but both Scott and Brian confirmed that they wanted us to use those controls.
This is brilliant, not only because it helps us, but for a load of useful reasons: it will let developers learn how to write controls early on the Silverlight 2 release process and will allow developers to fine-tune controls if they don't do exactly what they need.
This is important in particular for things like the DataGrid view, as there history has shown that there is no one-size-fits-all (regardless of how parameterized these controls are)
On Thursday I did a presentation on Moonlight. Due to the general nervousness of this presentation I forgot to do a few demos that I wanted to show. I wanted to show Popfly and wanted to show the Silverlight Journal (both 1.0-based applications).
If you install Moonlight from SVN, you will be able to watch the presentation on Linux.
Sebastien is now working on the security aspects of Moonlight (auditing code, understanding the attack surface, trying to break our code). He posted an updated diagram of the trusted callers in the various Silverlight 2 assemblies.
I personally would like to see "Meet the Experts" come back. Meet the Experts last year (and at the PDC) happens in the afternoon, as a last-session, there is food delivered and there are no other sessions scheduled, so its a good time for everyone to get together and quickly get some questions answered.
In my opinion, the bars and the party are no substitute for this session. Discussing styling of Silverlight controls on the bar goes more or less like this "WHAT ARE THE LIMITATIONS?", "NONE, YOU CAN CHANGE THE ENTIRE VISUAL TREE", "THE WHAT TREE?", "VISUAL", "WHAT?", "THE VISUAL TREE", "WHERE IS THE TREE?".
I still had a blast, but I would like to see "Meet the Experts" back on the agenda.
Posted on 11 Mar 2008
# hostinfo Mach kernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 9.0.0d1: Wed Oct 10 00:07:50 PDT 2007; root:xnu-9126.96.36.199.obj~7/RELEASE_ARM_S5L8900XRB Kernel configured for a single processor only. 1 processor is physically available. 1 processor is logically available. Processor type: armv6 (arm v6) Processor active: 0 Primary memory available: 116.00 megabytes Default processor set: 26 tasks, 164 threads, 1 processors Load average: 0.00, Mach factor: 0.98 # export MONO_DISABLE_SHM=1 # ./mono hello.exe Hello Mono World #
Posted on 10 Mar 2008
I just got back from Mix, updates my Moonlight from SVN and the videos at channel9 are now working with Mono.
Inside Silverlight 2 Beta 1, an overview with Scott Guthrie
This is one of the important pieces of our media pipeline that was missing (support for the HTTP streaming protocol). The implementation is based on the work that Fernando and Rolf did using the recently released specifications that Microsoft published.
Sadly, I was not able to show that at Mix. Its also the first take, so more testing and exercising will be required.
Posted on 08 Mar 2008
We have been hard at work in Moonlight and I keep postponing when to blog some updates about our work every few days hoping to cram some new feature in the blog post.
And every few days turn into every few weeks and the next thing you know what should have been published a month ago ends up being my pre-Mix post.
Some of the most important changes in the last two months have been:
Moonlight Media Pipeline: So far we had been using ffmpeg's pipeline to process media. This means that ffmpeg was in charge of detecting the media formats, locating the codecs, demultiplexing the data, and decoding the data into video and audio frames.
The ffmpeg pipeline was fine as a sample pipeline, but we needed a few more things. We needed more control over the pipeline to implement things like media streaming and supporting seek operations over HTTP; We want to be able to relicense the code under non-LGPL terms (for people that can not use the LGPL or some commercial uses) and we need to plug Microsoft's Media Pack media decoders.
Rolf rewrote our multimedia pipeline so that the code on SVN no longer depends on ffmpeg's pipeline and only uses ffmpeg's decoders for video and audio:
The end goal is to plug Microsoft's Media Pack (this contains the codecs video and audio) into Moonlight:
The installers that we currently distribute for Linux do not contain the ffmpeg media codecs. If you need to test media you will need to compile the code from source.
Streaming: With our new pipeline we are now able to stream media. In the past Moonlight downloaded the media file into the local file system, and only when the entire file was downloaded we would start the playback.
Moonlight can now start playback as soon as there is enough buffered data. This works for media that is only available over HTTP. Fernando has been working on the support for media that supports the MMS-over-HTTP (controlling seeking for example). Luckily, the specs for HTTP-based streaming to Windows Media servers were released last week (also the specs for the ASF container format, which should help validate our implementation).
Test Tools: As part of our collaboration with Microsoft we received various tools that are used to test Silverlight. We could not reuse the tools directly for Moonlight (too many Win32-isms, too hard to plug into Mozilla/Linux) so Jackson rewrote all of that code for Linux.
This should help us in creating our own tests, and in checking our own code for regressions beyond the test suites that we will have received from them.
The code should hit SVN soon.
Mozilla Installers: We created some installers for Mozilla that should offer a one-click install experience for users on Linux.
Verifier: Rodrigo continues to work on Mono's CIL verifier and on strengthening the image loader, work that will not be used immediately for our Silverlight 1.0 support, but that will be important for 2.0 (when Mono is required).
Historically Mono had not been used to execute untrusted code as we mostly were a runtime for desktop and server applications and errors in the images fell directly in the "doctor it hurts when I do this" category.
But with Silverlight 2.0 the story changes, Mono will be executing potentially hostile code so this work is mandatory. Additionally, Sebastien has been improving Gendarme and his Monoxide tool to help in the audit process and we have created a security audit plan for the runtime. This work, like the verifier work is a work in progress.
In addition to using it for Silverlight, the verifier work will enable the SecondLife folks to allow the execution of binary code in their simulators instead of being limiting SecondLife to use LSL-based scripts.
Windowless Support: As it turns out Windowless rendering is used by many Silverlight applications. This is where Silverlight content seamlessly blends with the HTMl content. This is a must-have for things like Tafiti, the XamlPad, and the Vista simulator and nice-to-have for some other sites.
The good news is that Chris has implemented the support for it:
The bad news is that this is limited to Firefox 3.0, the 2.0 edition does not have support for Windowless rendering.
See Chris' blog entry for the details about the challenges and limitations of Moonlight/Windowless in Firefox/Linux.
Bug weeks: With the test suite running on Linux we have been focusing on passing all the Microsoft tests that we can and implementing the major features missing (like Windowless support).
Silverlight 2.0 Other than the JIT support for Silvelright 2.0 at this point we have not done any work on it (well there are 3 classes stubbed privately).
There are two reasons for this: the updated 2.0 API is not public and although we have access to it, it is a bit of a mess to try to keep two separate trees (public and private) to support this and since Mix is just around the corner, we will just wait until next week.
The second reason is that we want to focus on shipping 1.0, completing the media pack integration and working on the configuration aspects of Moonlight (auto-update configuration for instance).
Everyone on the team has been working very hard to get all the pieces in place, and we are getting closer to completion. Every time we fix a bug, it has a nice ripple effect of fixing various other issues that we had seen in some sites at once.
Our priority currently is to ship Moonlight 1.0, and this means more or less:
Am excited about the Mix conference, looking forward to see the demos and what gets announced. And obviously very excited about my own session on Thursday to talk about Moonlight and Mono.
Time to go to sleep. Marek and myself are on a 7am flight and it will be hard to make it.
Posted on 03 Mar 2008
The interview that I had when I visited Microsoft for the Lang.NET 2008 has been posted to Channel9. Its a conversation between Charles, Dragos (from the Volta team) and myself on open source, .NET, Mono, Moonlight and other fun topics.
Posted on 29 Feb 2008
Last week some of us from the Mono team at Novell went to San Francisco for the Game Developers Conference. As some of my dear readers know, I was not much of a gamer a year ago, and I do not claim to understand this industry.
Mono is currently being used by a major publisher  to script a new version of a popular franchise (the new edition) and Mono is also the engine that drives Unity3D for scripting and SecondLife is beta testing Mono now on their beta grid.
Other than being fascinated by Unity3D and SecondLife, we had not really paid much attention to games. But in the last nine months we started to get a constant stream of requests to license the Mono runtime to power more and more games.
When Joseph Hill joined Novell in January as Mono's product manager we started to revisit some of these request. People wanted to get a proprietary license for Mono to use on the PlayStation, the XBox and the Wii and some folks also wanted Mono under non-LGPL terms (as it turns out, important to prevent cheating).
Three weeks before the GDC conference, our in-house expert on the game industry Michael Hutchinson told us that this conference existed. In a couple of days we booked some space on the show and we got things in place, we were going to promote Mono as an accelerated scripting engine.
As it turns out, .NET-based tools and .NET-based scripting of tools are pervasive in the game industry.
As for the games themselves, engines are typically written in a combination of C++, C and assembly language and the high-level code is written with scripting languages. Lua is the most popular language to embed in a game (a procedural C-like language) and Python, variations on Lisp and a never ending stream of evolved batch languages.
People want to reuse Mono on games for a few different tasks. These are some of the reasons that we know about:
Luckily, developers that have been writing Lua code for years will be happy to know that they can compile their Lua code to run on Mono (and get the performance boost they need) by using the Lua2IL compiler.
Update: The always great Lua developers have pointed out that the new thing is not Lua2IL but LuaCLR.
Mono does not really attempt to compete with Microsoft XNA
Microsoft's XNA is an end-to-end solution for game developers that want to create games for Windows, the XBox and the Zune, the XNA approach is to write manage code on *top* of XNA.
This works for certain kinds of games, but in the game developer space, some developers need to support more than one console and the high-end games (am sure there is a technical terms for these) end up licensing game engines, audio engines, graphics and physics from all kinds of middleware vendors.
In those cases (even when targeting the XBox) C# and .NET would not be available to the game developer.
So we basically think of the Mono runtime merely as a fast scripting engine with all of the ECMA/ISO CLI benefits and not really as providers of gaming APIs.
There has been some discussion in the #mono channel recently about whether we would create or endorse a gaming API developed by a third party. Like blessing Tao or OpenTK as the standard way of building games for Mono.
Although there is some value in having a blessed set of libraries for Mono, and I have no problem if people want to call their libraries Mono.Gaming, at this point the team at Novell is not able to dedicate any cycles to this effort (we can provide spiritual support, along the lines of yelling "Go team! Go" from the sidelines).
Am personally fascinated by running computational code on the GPU or taking advantage of special CPU instructions at the runtime level. Last year I wrote a bit about how we could implement this in Mono (Microsoft has already an implementation) and later we even made it part of our interviewing process.
At the conference some people asked as to whether it would be possible to take advantage of the PlayStation3 six SPE processors. During the conference I had no idea that there was already a project using Mono on the PS3 with Linux that already does this, but the idea sounded fascinating.
It is particularly fascinating because the SPEs on the PS3 do not have the same limitations than GPU computations have, these are full blown CPUs (with some memory limitations) but still general purpose computation devices.
Paolo pointed me to CellDotNet: A project to make it possible to run .NET code on the Cell architecture.. CellDotNet is basically a JIT compiler (written in entirely in C#) that can compile CIL bytecodes into native code for the PS3 SPE processors (this is a project from Klaus Hansen and Rasmus Halland).
They have ported the SciMark benchmark to use some vector operations in the SPE. Currently I am unable to report the numbers as I do not have a PS3 running Linux, but I am expensing a PS3 as we speak to be able to report these back to you dear readers.
What makes CellDotNet all the more interesting is combining C# new functional features with the the Parallel Extensions to .NET.
Two good articles to get a grasp on what this offers are: Optimize Managed Code For Multi-Core Machines and Parallel LINQ: Running Queries On Multi-Core Processors.
PLINQ is built on top of the Language Integrated Query (LINQ), and although it has been promoted mostly as a technology to do database queries, the Parallel LINQ extensions basically supports map/reduce inside C#.
 Our contract with said major publisher does not allow me to disclose who they are or the the game they develop on my blog. But it allows Novell to publish the information on the Novell site. After a year of asking Novell people to put this information on the web site, the information has not yet been posted. So the mystery as to what this is will sadly continue.
Posted on 26 Feb 2008
The Lang.NET 2008 talks have been published.
They require Silverlight 1.0, but Moonlight compiled from source with ffmpeg support is able to play those presentations back.
If you are in a rush, see the following post for details on downloading the WMV file (so you do not need to install Moonlight from source on Linux).
Posted on 24 Feb 2008
Some of the Mono folks have blogged about their work for last week hack-week:
Paolo and Zoltan rearchitected the Regular expression library in Mono and got a 9x performance improvement in regular expression matching. The work had two components: redesign of the opcodes in the regular expression engine, and generating native code using Reflection.Emit. At least for the Language Shootout case, the new regular expression code is the second best (Tcl is faster, but apparently Tcl does not cope with Unicode regexes).
Wade worked on MythTV under XGL and making Tomboy Scale.
Andrew added Zeroconf/Bonjour support to Giver (a tool used to easily share files with friends or nearby users). And he also worked on Tasky a simple task management tool that integrates with Remember the Milk. He also wrote a command line tool to remotely control Tomboy. screencast.
He also improved its APIs and performance. He also started to fix some bugs in our class libraries based on the analysis done by Gendarme.
Jonathan ported his XMPP/VB.NET client to Mono:
And also got MonoDevelop running natively on Windows:
Jonathan Pryor spent the week polishing various loose ends. Including the release of his fantastic NDesk.GetOptions command-line parsing library and providing documentation to various components in Mono.
Atsushi worked on the implementation of WebHttpBinding (part of 3.5 WCF) and various other parts. See his blog for details.
Mark polished his MathMap composer tool.
Marek did some work towards replacing System.Reflection.Emit with Cecil. After some discussion we believe we can keep both backends, one to keep things as usual, and another to be used with MonoDevelop (so MCS provides the actual parsing for the editor intellisense and compile-as-you-type support).
Jackson worked on a couple of interesting demonstrations with Aaron, which hopefully they will be able to demo soon.
Carlos spent his time improving System.IO.Serial, there were a handful of events not implemented that he worked on.
Andreia and Marek worked on a Gtk# native client for Bugzilla.
Stephane created a new Gtk.Print/Cairo dialog for F-Spot and worked on support for TimeZones in F-Spot (code has not been commited yet).
Everaldo worked on packaging Mono for Maemo4. He has promised a number of blog posts detailing the work on GarMono, and the new packages that will be included on it.
Rolf continued to replace SRE with Cecil in the VB.NET compiler.
Lluis worked on improving Mono.Addins and creating an add-in for authoring add-ins in MonoDevelop.
Paolo early on also extended C# to allow inline-IL assembly language code (similar to __asm__ in C or C++ in some compilers). See the blog post for the various samples of C# with embedded IL.
Chris worked on a scheme compiler.
Jeff learned more about Regular Expressions than he wanted to. Update: Jeff wrote an add-in for MonoDevelop to do Evolution plugins in C#.
Update: I had not finished reading all the status reports on the mailing list. Dick Porter wrote bluetooth support for F-Spot. There is a bug in the system underlying bluetooth C libraries that prevents it from working correctly out of the box, but hopefully that will get fixed.
Update: Mike Krueger improved extensively the search functionality in MonoDevelop, it now implements Emacs/Mozilla-like searching and he also wrote an assembly browser/decompiler that is plugged right into the solution browser.
As for me, I spent the week going insane over the incredibly frustrating T61p problems with performance. Inspired by Marek's encouragement to learn LINQ and functional-style programming, I started a project that I abandoned quickly to implement a managed spreadsheet.
At least I learned two lessons: am more comfortable writing tokenizers using the regular call-back system than the automatically generated state machine from generators. I also learned that OOXML is very easy to parse, but it would be nice for PDF files to have hyperlinks in the spec.
I am probably missing a few things, but I did not catch all the blog posts this week.
Posted on 23 Feb 2008